Herman Bavinck [argued against both Infra- and Supralapsarianism](http://calvinandcalvinism.com/?p=355), writing that God's decree to allow the fall and his decree to elect some to salvation are so intricately linked, both causally and teleologically that it cannot rightly be said that one logically precedes the other. They are both dependent on each other.
This raises the question: what should Bavinck's view be called?
Your vote: Alapsarianism