Which of the following factors should the Selection Committee weight the most heavily in determining bids and seeds for the NCAA Tournament?
(Multiple choice is allowed).
option |
vote |
1). ”Regular Season Reward": Team strength over the course of the season (e.g., KenPom/Sagarin ratings).
|
2
|
2). "Demonstrated Potential": Team strength apex/ceiling as demonstrated at some point during the season (i.e., "marquee win").
|
1
|
3). "Perceived Potential": Team strength apex/ceiling as perceived based on roster composition, health, momentum, coaching, history, and other harder-to-quantify factors (i.e., a team expected to "outperform" the sum of its pre-tournament parts once March
|
0
|
4). "Resume Red Flags": Team resume presence/absence of "red flags" suggesting something about a team that transcends the usual resume comparisons (e.g., number/magnitude of "bad" losses, high variance home/road performance, non-conference strength of sch
|
0
|
< View All polls